Holding hards

Design for Social Impact Accelerator: DESIGNING OTHERWISE

Next cohort starts June 5th 2026

An intimate, global, group programme for non-profit, philanthropy, and academic professionals who shape proposals, fundraising, and strategy—and who are ready to rethink how social impact, and aid, is designed.

Power, Proposals, and the Politics of Programme Design

 

An 8-week cohort for people who design programmes and write proposals — and are ready to reckon with the power they hold.

Most courses teach you how to design better programmes.
This one asks a different question:

What if the problem isn’t your tools — but the system those tools serve?

Designing Otherwise is a radical reimagining of programme design and proposal writing, grounded in abolitionist thinking, Black radical imagination, regeneration, and community sovereignty. We know that: 

Design is never neutral

It is about power.

Communities are not stakeholders; they are sovereign

Evidence is contested, political, and relational

Refusal is a legitimate design choice

Repair matters more than scale

Constructive complicity: Most of us can't quit - but we can redistribute from within

Unlike typical courses that optimise tools, this programme surfaces the invisible architecture of power in programme design, evidence, budgets, community participation, and proposals. It is designed for practitioners working inside systems, and alongside community-based leaders, who want to make different choices — even under constraint.

 

Who Should Join?

This is for you if you are:

  • programme designers, proposal writers, or strategists in INGOs, foundations, government, or public bodies

  • fundraising or grant teams who recognise that design and proposals are political

  • CBO leaders and community practitioners who want to challenge extractive design norms

  • policy professionals, evaluators, and MERL practitioners who want to move beyond technical fix approaches

  • people who want to redistribute power, not polish programmes

This isn’t just about learning. It’s about unlearning, redistributing, refusing, and practising differently.

 

Why This Learning Space Exists

Programme design and proposal writing are often treated as technical tasks.

They’re not.

They decide:

  • whose knowledge counts

  • which problems are worth funding

  • how money moves (and who controls it)

  • what kinds of futures are considered realistic

Too often, design happens under urgency, shaped by templates, deadlines, and donor expectations — long before communities have had any real say.

Designing Otherwise exists because:

  • participation has been reduced to consultation

  • localisation rarely extends to budgets or decision-making

  • evidence is extracted, not returned

  • proposal writers hold enormous power with very little accountability

This programme is an invitation to interrupt that architecture — and practise differently, even inside constraint.

What Makes Designing Otherwise Different

This is not a skills course.
It is a practice lab.

Across eight weeks, we treat programme design, proposals, MEL, and budgets as political infrastructures, and we work with frameworks that are often kept at the margins of the sector.

You will engage with:

  • Abolitionist thinking — distinguishing reformist fixes from non-reformist reforms

  • Black radical imagination — treating imagination as a method, not a luxury

  • Regeneration, not sustainability — moving from managing harm to repairing systems

  • Doughnut economics — using limits as a design constraint, not a growth tool

  • Data and knowledge sovereignty — including the right to refuse extraction

  • Land and place — even in urban, digital, or humanitarian contexts

Community-based organisations are not case studies in this programme.
They are co-designers, critics, and knowledge-holders.

How the Programme Works

  • 8 weekly live sessions (90 minutes each)

  • Starts Friday 5th June ( 08:00 EDT, 13:00 BST, 15:00 EAT, 16:00 UTC+4, 20:00 AWST). Click here for your time zone
  • Cohort size: 15–20 people (intentional mix of institutional practitioners and CBO leaders)

  • Co-facilitated with lived-experience and movement practitioners 

  • 1 x individual coaching session (weeks 3–6)

  • Weekly applied work using your real programmes or proposals

  • Ongoing peer accountability and post-programme follow-up

This is slow, relational learning — not content delivery.

Weekly Curriculum Themes

  1. Design as Harm or Care

    From charity logic to abolitionist clarity:  Expose programme design and proposals as technologies that can either organise abandonment or organise care. Establish abolitionist orientation and collective responsibility.

  2. Power, History & Non-Reformist Reforms :Working inside institutions without becoming them: Understand power historically and structurally. Learn to operate as constructively complicit - acknowledging we're inside extractive systems while actively redistributing power.

  3. Decolonisation, Land & Epistemic Sovereignty
    Move beyond DEI toward land, power, and knowledge repatriation. Centre Indigenous and place-based governance logics.

  4. Participation or Theatre?
    Build participatory processes that redistribute power — even under tight timelines. Distinguish genuine co-design from consultation performance.

  5. Proposals as Political Documents
    Treat proposals as narrative battlegrounds. Learn strategic compliance, translation, and refusal. Understand when translation becomes co-optation.

  6. Accountability, Data & Refusal
    Build accountability structures with teeth. Reclaim data sovereignty and the right to refuse extraction.

  7. Regeneration & Doughnut Design
    Replace sustainability-as-management with regeneration-as-repair. Use doughnut economics as a constraint. Address the economic implications of doing less.

  8. Commitments & Afterlives
    Move from learning to durable practice. Prevent extraction from the course itself. Create accountability infrastructure.

Self-Funded

ÂŁ500

per person

  • This is for individuals who are self-funding.
  • A small number of partial and full bursaries will be available-please enquire.
BUY NOW

Small Organisations

ÂŁ635

per person

  • This is for individuals whose organisations are funding their place.
  • We consider a small non-profit (annual income below ÂŁ1 million).
BUY NOW

Large non-profit

ÂŁ998

per person

  • This is for individuals whose organisations are funding their place.
  • We also offer a reduced rate for teams from the same organisation.
BUY NOW

Learn From Those Reimagining Program Design

At Design for Social Impact, we believe in platforming systems-impact leaders who are reshaping how social change happens. As a social enterprise, we are committed to amplifying voices that challenge the status quo and push the boundaries of equity-centered program design.

Each week, our carefully curated global faculty shares firsthand experiences of integrating anti-oppressive approaches into social impact work. These conversations go beyond theory—they offer real-world insights into how nonprofit leaders, funders, and designers are shifting power, centering community voices, and building liberatory alternatives to traditional program models.

We are continuously expanding our faculty to bring you the most cutting-edge and transformative perspectives. Scroll down to meet some of our past guest speakers on our Research Design for Social Impact course.

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

A Final Question

Who signs your proposals?
Who decides what gets designed?
What would change if you practised otherwise?

If you’re ready to sit with those questions — and work through them in community — Designing Otherwise is for you.